Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
This was about the Petition. If they agreed to it, then there is at least some influence over the developers.they think, invent and make, make and make in my opinion a good game, despite the hum of "constructive" criticism.Everything was invented before them. They shouldn't be making the game from "0". They are making a sequel to a specific game. If Terminator 3 didn't have Schwarzenegger, would you have watched that movie? I doubt it. It is the same here. And the game should be criticized specifically before release, not after. After that, a verdict is simply delivered. I am not going to claim that my criticism is 100% constructive.:) That is clearly not the case. There are far too many emotions in it:) I was interested in the new features announced by Nival, but they removed them from the game:( And ATV is not suitable for strategies. With it, RPGs become arcade-like. IMHO.:)
Katrine
