Thoughts on the scenario after completing "Hammers of Fate".

I apologize, but your comments seem increasingly nonsensical and unfounded, and there's no logical connection between the phrases. You labeled Nival and Ubisoft as "Americans," inexplicably sentenced Railag to death, consider Tarnum a Hollywood superhero, claim Ashan has no backstory, and generally feel that "everything is wrong"...
In my opinion, all of this simply indicates a lack of knowledge about the subject matter, combined with a strong desire to prove something.
I don't want to argue about anything anymore. It's pointless.
Sincerely, ViVoRANDUM.

Colleague, please forgive my somewhat clumsy wording. I have a problem where my thoughts run ahead of my words, and I assume that everyone around me is already familiar with them.
I think we're not quite understanding each other because of my either incomplete explanations or misunderstandings:smile33: :smile41:
I'm not denying "Heroes..." as a game, as I've been a fan of it since the days when we launched the .exe file from Norton Commander.
I'm not criticizing the game; I just don't quite like the way some of the scenarios/missions are presented. And why "American"... From my point of view, the meaning of the single-player missions is too strongly reminiscent of star-spangled ideals -
to conquer everything and establish control over all resources. You can argue that this is the genre of the game, and I agree with you, but it seems to me that it's too much like imperial ambitions. Although that's precisely why I'm a fan of strategy games.
If you decide to end our conversation, that's a shame. It's not often that I get to chat with an intelligent person who shares my fondness for the game. If I've offended you in any way, I humbly apologize.
Sincerely, Zeratul (in real life - Eduard)