Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
But if among these hundred people there are those close to you, what will your choice be then? The Path of Light can save both the hundred and the thousands, and there is a way out of any situation, but choosing the "lesser of two evils" is hardly a bright path, IMHO.
I am, of course, talking about those situations where nothing can be done; before that, I will do everything to save everyone, but this rarely works out... If there are close people, I will do it. Yes, with a heavy heart, yes, I will be tormented by my conscience afterward, but I will do it. Besides, my close people are more likely to be among the thousands... And in my opinion, choosing the greater of two evils when there was a chance to choose the lesser is definitely not a bright path.
If the Sun shines around the clock, do you think there will be less evil? But what about droughts? And what about the southern regions where the temperature reaches 50 degrees during the day?
Darkness is necessary to balance the light, at least in nature.
Where do we go? Where do we end up when we save the world?