:smile19: Deleted :smile19:
Reason: Irrelevant to the discussion topic, and a veiled insult to the opponent.
Sincerely, Kyle.

Regarding the save – don't lie again, I even provided the log from the ICQ chat there; there are no words like "you developed well," but something else is written. And I always look at the game after the game, specifically on the first day of the game – this provides more information about how much money was available at the restart, what guards were present, and what the starting army was (and only then – separate other days). I started looking at this save (I already wrote why, although sometimes you need to read carefully what others write) – it was marked like Alex 111, as a save from the first day, while our save was marked simply as 11111, and subsequent ones – again, Alex 2, 3, etc. In general, I already wrote that it doesn't matter what I looked at, as I had the right to do so after taking the restart on day 115, even though you lied there, saying that I looked at the save before the end of the game...

Furthermore, show the ICQ log where you confirmed that you agreed to a mutual restart when I reached day 117 and wrote about the restart? There was none of that; instead, you were writing on the forum that I also violated the rules by leaving the game, and there are no words anywhere that you acknowledged this as a restart. The judge agreed with your arguments and considered that my unwillingness to continue the game after the deadline, when a restart is taken, is an admission of defeat by the player. And if the rule hadn't been so blatantly violated, the judge would have ruled in my favor, and I would have had to accept it, as I refused to continue the game, and there was no proof why. And how brazen must one be to suddenly agree to a restart on the 5th day after the defeat was awarded? Disgusting...

Regarding the golems – the game save is available, and everyone can see that it was very difficult not to notice the golems, especially since there is such a clear boundary between the respawn points, and Alex_R has not been playing for the first day or first game, so he should know that the guards are located between the respawn points, and not already at the castle (like the wolves that are standing there, which also guard the important area, and are not just standing there as guards of a passage without any objects nearby).
And, :smile19: Deleted :smile19:
Reason: Irrelevant to the discussion topic.
Sincerely, Kyle.

Regarding the fact that I "lie" about you, when asking me not to attack, saying that you would split the two stacks of troops into single units – I won't even comment on that.... I guess I'm abnormal, and I only attack if the opponent is building a castle near the Citadel, bringing troops from the secondary town, and blatantly running into the castle with the main hero and the entire army, and before that, I just stand and wait. I already wrote about this in previous posts; you were lucky, you tricked me, and I don't have ICQ logs where I can read that you only talk about splitting the troops and nothing else (since you wrote it in the game), so the judge ruled in my favor due to the lack of evidence, but I think those who have been reading here for a long time already know who is lying....

Regarding the choice of castles – you lied here too, ugh... Here is the ICQ log in which I first suggested that he fight, giving him the choice of a castle.

Date and time: 12/18/2007 00:09 AM
You sent a message to user Alex_R
Hello, when are you playing? Write to me, what time? Dmitry 777 wrote a lot about you, it seems like you play very badly, as I understand? I'm not very good either (I lose often, I'm very slow, and I'm very weak in theory) – but, if you want, so that you're not afraid, you can choose any castle and color, and I will also choose any for myself, except for the worst ones (Tower, Inferno, and Citadel).

And only after some time, I sent him the following in ICQ:

Date and time: 12/18/2007 07:08 PM
You sent a message to user Alex_R
And so – I'm ready to fight any day, in principle, so just let me know (as I wrote, you choose a castle for yourself and me, and you choose a color for yourself).

Note that it says "as I wrote," I wrote to him the first time, any castle, except for which ones; the second time, I didn't need to specify which ones again, for what reason.....

Although – after the game with Alex_R, I realized how weak he is as a player, and if we had agreed to play now, I would have let him choose any castle at all, even a Conflux on a Citadel.

Regarding the fact that I wrote that the Dungeon is much stronger than the Castle, and I was ready to switch and play with me on the Dungeon, and him on the Castle, and if he wins, I would immediately confirm 3 defeats – yes, that was the case. Now, knowing how weak Alex_R actually is, I would have confirmed 5 defeats if I had managed to lose to him with the Dungeon against the Castle...