Controversial issues and their resolutions.

I do not confirm the report - as the game was not completed...
On 1-1-5, the opponent entered my territory and asked if he could attack... I replied that the rules state: if an encounter occurs before 1-1-6, one of the players has the right to request a restart - after which the opponent left the game...
After negotiations in the chat, we agreed to continue the game from the fifth day - but during the next two turns, we could not agree on what was allowed and what was not... and on 1-1-7, the opponent left the game.
P.S. For my own interest, I sent the saves to the judge regarding the un-cleared guard...
Firstly, the golems that were standing near the road were indeed not noticed by me in the dirt...
Secondly, I believe that the guard was a little further away, specifically 50-99 wolves.
And most importantly, don't rush to make such loud statements (accusations against me) - don't forget that before agreeing to continue the game, you opened the saves!!!;)

What, are you, :smile19: Deleted :smile19:, or something???? When did I open the saves, :smile19: Deleted :smile19:?
I wrote to him that I was ending the game because he was attacking me on the 5th day, I wrote to him in the game many times - but he didn't answer (which is more than suspicious), and then I wrote to him in the chat that I would be reviewing the game while he was away. Immediately, Alex_R appeared and started whining, saying let's continue the game, don't look at the saves, I agreed, waited for 5-10 minutes, but for some reason, he didn't create a game!!!! (This is when I strongly suspected that Alex_R was looking at the saves at that moment, because after that pause, he replied to me in the chat that he had read the rules, as if he was playing for the first time and hadn't read them before (and he could also have read them during my turn, when I had many battles, and he knew about it from the previous turn). Then he finally created the game, and now he's telling me here that I was looking at the saves, after I agreed to his whining and continued the game, :smile19: Deleted :smile19:. Maybe he'll write that I was playing with cheat codes and clearing everything with archers, huh? If there is a punishment for such blatant slander, it should be applied to Alex_R, because this is already beyond the limit, :smile19: Deleted :smile19:, after he has violated the rules and remained silent, as if no one noticed (about the wolves - he's just talking nonsense, they are almost in the middle of the grass and are guarding, it's great that he knows that the guard should be on the border of the territories, between the grass and the ground, and it couldn't be clearer than the golems standing there - and he came up with that).

Regarding leaving on 117 - everything is described there, don't "play dumb"...
Alex_R begged not to attack his Castle on the 6th day, although he was simply trying to deceive, because there is nothing about it in the rules, or people restart the game due to an encounter on 116 (which I did at the beginning, because I attacked his Castle on the 5th day), or, if they play by mutual agreement, then it's already with all "attacks", otherwise what's the point of playing for the one who came to the opponent. I went along with it, thinking that he would arrange his troops during his turn, and I wouldn't attack, but he was so :smile19: Deleted :smile19: that he simply cynically didn't allow me to attack because he couldn't get the main hero with the troops into the Castle, can you imagine???? Can a normal player act like that???? After such rudeness, I immediately left the game, although I had a normal army even to take his Castle with a full army...

But he didn't lose because of that, but because of a gross violation on 113, i.e. even before all those encounters and attacks, and what happened after that is already irrelevant to this game, it can only be mentioned as a potential issue for the future

Kyle: You are receiving a warning for violating the Rules of the HeroesWorld Portal, specifically for violating rule #2, for using inappropriate and offensive language in your message and for insulting a portal user.
In the future: Please be more restrained.