Expedition: general discussions.

I recall the word "will replenish" was mentioned there, but there will be no proof, because the forum's keyword search is too poor.

I found it...

And you, Yashchur, are a spoiled egoist. In the expedition, you only care about your own skin. You envy everyone around you while having more. You whine about everything. You think the GM should lick your toes, satisfy your every whim, and never get in your way. I indulged you throughout the entire expedition. But I miscalculated once. And got black ingratitude in return. And even after that, I met you halfway. What naivety. To believe that one can coexist with Yashchur in an expedition. No, impossible! You killed the Obelisks, ruined a ton of Reven's work. And were even forgiven. In vain. With that inflated ego, all you can do is ruin expeditions. Putting you in a greenhouse environment is pointless. You'll still find a way to pour a stream of whining onto everyone's heads.

Just let me remind you, no matter how hard a player tries, no matter how much soul a player invests in their character... being a GM is a hundred times harder. Yashchur could have gone the path of simple questions and suggestions. But no! He only knows the path of apocalypse. I think he simply enjoys killing expeditions. I'll even allow for the possibility that he's actually a troll. 

It would have been possible to "coexist" actually, if you had promptly clarified the misunderstandings in what was happening and avoided trolling. By the way, regarding "trolling"... There's plain trolling, and there's malicious trolling (snickering). The former is allowed, and the latter is not. Trolling Geroyist is plain trolling, trolling Alex (when he wrote "Serviceman, did you bring me a lady? And where are the candles?") is plain trolling. But "trukhany" is malicious trolling, Nebko's trollings are malicious, Neira's trolling (about the "double bed") is malicious. I don't think I need to explain why? Perhaps they still don't understand why I consider them malicious (although I've written on this topic many times), but nevertheless...

You wanted to portray Zaya as a "ham-fisted aristocrat" who can neither do laundry nor cook. That's plain trolling, and there are reasons for it in principle. But I mistakenly perceived it as malicious trolling (I've also already written on this topic). Why? Because there's a "toxic atmosphere of fucking, whoring, and debauchery" here. Perhaps I'll spell it all out step by step to finally "close the issue".

Zaya's snack turns out to be simple but tasty. It couldn't leave any man indifferent. But soon Aristarch feels the approach of countless hordes from the direction of his intestines and stomach. Realizing that his rear won't hold out long under the enemy's onslaught, Aristarch instinctively runs to the toilet and locks himself in. The battle with the knights of the brown banner drains much of the dropout's strength and ends in victory only closer to morning.

Where is there a single word about "ham-fisted aristocracy" here?

That's not the point. Zaya and Aristarch's "friendzone" relationship didn't sit well with someone, just as Eric's "touch-me-not" attitude didn't sit well with someone. And the snickering began... Fucking, I suppose, would have been "to their liking".

It's obvious that I misunderstood your intent. Why not clarify?

Alright, in short...Astral, these are your words or did Nebok quietly sign it? So go ahead, restore Aristarch's ODs however you want and stop with the snickering. Especially on the topic of "gender relations". I won't "appreciate" them in any case...

If the "exchange of 3 ODs for 100 experience" had been within the rules mechanics, or if this "exchange" hadn't existed at all (and it had been limited to "roleplay"), I would have written something like "No big deal, 'future wife', we'll have maids to do the laundry and cooking..." and that would have been it. We would have continued the interrupted conversation in the morning (I was planning to tell about Ida) and that would have been the end of it. You should have returned the ODs, not acted on the principle of "the GM is the boss, you're the fool"...

And then Nebko's post, and well... that's basically it...

Don't bring up "killed the obelisks" and "ruined a ton of Reven's work". There was more than enough malicious trolling, bias, and unexplained ambiguities from Reven there...

If it makes you feel better, I can say that I'll give you only 1/6 of the reward for the quest "Kill Yashchur's desire to play in expeditions", 1/3 to Nebko, and 1/2 to Reven. The others also contributed their "share" to forming the "toxic atmosphere", but I won't give them anything, because... because such is my "GM will"...🤣