Good and evil.

What do you think of this controversial statement: the line between good and evil is law?;)
Personally, I believe it is (at least in most cases).

I can say for sure that the law serves as a boundary between good and evil, but the ultimate distinction is morality (including justice). Morality is higher than the law, and the law should essentially depend on morality, although this is often not the case: morality, for example, believes that it is fair to execute someone for murder (an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth) - the law either corresponds to this or it doesn't.
Sometimes the law directly contradicts morality, for example, eviction from a dwelling: the law allows me to evict my parents, children, or spouse onto the street, but morality does not!
Even Solovyov (the philosopher) in his philosophy of all-unity moved from the law (rights) as a lower form to morality (justice) and from the latter to love.
And in England, courts of equity still exist. In general, when resolving an issue based on justice, unwritten law works better than our laws written on paper)).

I wanted to say nothing about the USA, but I can't resist((.
The fact that computers and the internet were invented in the USA may be a lie, or it may be true, I don't know. But I do know that in the 1950s, computers (the size of apartments) were used in our research institutes (forensic science). And the internet appeared in the army a long time ago - in the 80s and 85s. It was just not available to the average person.
We must give them credit; they are indeed driving the IT industry forward, but quoting the words of one person, they spend much more on cosmetics. And imagine if they spent as much on developing IT - we would have been exploring the vastness of space long ago)))