Heroist
Auto-translated
I think everyone here has formed their own opinion over the years, which they will consider the only correct one, and no amount of rehashing it will change it or convince anyone else.
I would like to see less hate, both open and hidden, and also to avoid misleading newcomers and undermining the game by throwing fuel on the fire with our own biased opinions. It seems that similar practices were already used in the old community.
Yashchur should also understand that he can discuss the situation and ask for the opinions of all participants, but only with the moderator will a constructive dialogue be possible, because only they are the direct participants in the incident. This dialogue may end with a harsh rejection, but at least it will be an objective answer. It is very easy to get worked up by other people's comments due to past frustration, and I do this every expedition with Shabeta as an expert.
People are not monolithic; moods, situations, events, and circumstances vary. Even if the moderator and players are the same, it is impossible to combine all games and give them a definitive conclusion. There are times when players make bad decisions, times when moderators make bad decisions, there are difficult games, there are easy games, sometimes luck is on your side, and sometimes it isn't. That's the beauty of these things. And you can endlessly replay the same template in the game without all this.
Fruit-and-cabbage jabbering is a good thing when it's new and exciting, or when it's remembered as a local meme. But a reactor that has been smoldering for years no longer brings anything interesting or positive to anyone.
Move on.
I would like to see less hate, both open and hidden, and also to avoid misleading newcomers and undermining the game by throwing fuel on the fire with our own biased opinions. It seems that similar practices were already used in the old community.
Yashchur should also understand that he can discuss the situation and ask for the opinions of all participants, but only with the moderator will a constructive dialogue be possible, because only they are the direct participants in the incident. This dialogue may end with a harsh rejection, but at least it will be an objective answer. It is very easy to get worked up by other people's comments due to past frustration, and I do this every expedition with Shabeta as an expert.
People are not monolithic; moods, situations, events, and circumstances vary. Even if the moderator and players are the same, it is impossible to combine all games and give them a definitive conclusion. There are times when players make bad decisions, times when moderators make bad decisions, there are difficult games, there are easy games, sometimes luck is on your side, and sometimes it isn't. That's the beauty of these things. And you can endlessly replay the same template in the game without all this.
Fruit-and-cabbage jabbering is a good thing when it's new and exciting, or when it's remembered as a local meme. But a reactor that has been smoldering for years no longer brings anything interesting or positive to anyone.
Move on.
Whatever