Hey, you, tall guy!

Personally, I received 0. Glory to Russia!

They didn't offer anything at first. I think these kinds of promotions started last year.

Added 2 minutes ago

They promised to give you nothing, that's all they promised in my time. Those who were promised something were lazy soy-drinking losers who didn't get up and join the fight when things were at their peak, but instead sat on their couch until the very end. Our whole group condemns such people; we send them straight to the meat grinder.

Well, here. What can you say? The idea of fighting for money is also an idea.

Added 5 minutes ago

Exactly, you understand and can empathize. Now, mentally transfer this situation to the relationship market. It's the same thing there, even worse. A woman is the EMPLOYER, and a man is the EMPLOYEE. And in this context, it doesn't matter who is to blame or what to do. It just happened this way, and it will only get worse over time.

I'm not arguing that in many cases, the transition from the status of "just acquaintances" and "just friends" is more often determined by the woman. But in reality, it's not a one-sided game, and "employers" more often encounter "employees" who are looking for "temporary work" for one or two nights and don't want serious and responsible "working" relationships. Not to mention the "watermeloners," jerks, and henpecked husbands (some people actually like that). And let's not forget about situations where the "employee's" mother interferes in the "work process" and ruins everything. Contrary to the old jokes about mothers-in-law, the mothers of "employers" less often create problems.