Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
2 Sforza:
Okay, let's examine your example about the Conflux mage. Why do you say that only magic power and knowledge increase? For example:
Initially, the hero is Inteus (skills are obviously 0 0 3 3); level 2 - attack +1; level 3 - magic power +1; level 4 - attack +1, and so on until level 10. The result: we see the initial skills are 3 0 7 2, i.e., we draw the corresponding conclusions...
I'm not arguing that the skills of "warriors" are most favorable for capturing certain buildings (dwarven mines, necropolises, etc.) or that in a scenario where the number of units is significantly small, mages will take the lead, i.e., everything depends on the situation. I was interested in the question of why you consider Conflux mages to be better than Castle mages? Did you really base your opinion on the fact that:
1) the initial skill (earth, air...) is already present?
2) mana costs are lower?
Is that correct?
"Единственное, что можно сказать с уверенностью об удаче - она изменит..."