Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
It amuses me how... In all the topics about monsters, the question is "Who is the best?" and not "Who is the strongest?". And mostly, everyone discusses how one or another warrior will win against another in a 1v1 battle.
And the word "best" implies not only the strength of this soldier, but also his other abilities and possibilities. In essence, the Monarch brought the strongest warriors at a certain level (or almost). Who can only show strength... But very many other army combinations, which combine not only strength, but also the ability to somehow help their own and mess with the enemy, can simply "tear apart" this bunch of "muscleheads".
For example: Manticore + Ogre Mage vs. Vampire + Black Knight. The Manticore will paralyze the Black Knight, and with the help of the Ogre and his bloodlust, they will easily defeat the Vampire. After that, finishing off the Black Knight will only be a matter of time, although not without problems.