Vanechka
Auto-translated
Of course - you're all "RP" players here, and everyone else is just a NOOB.
The topic is actually useful precisely because it contains descriptions of game tactics - whether it's random maps, fixed maps, with or without economic development.
The description of tactics is just material for reflection; each reader has the opportunity to decide for themselves which of the tactics is acceptable. Therefore, you shouldn't worry so much about beginners: if a beginner has a "nutcracker" strategy, then even if you convey the "correct" tactic to him, he is hopeless.
In my opinion, if you continue to persistently determine who is a noob and who is a pro, and how THEY differ from THESE and Soda, the topic will again be overgrown with posts like "monsters are cool..." "Stronghold? Ugh, how can anyone even play it"...
Do you really need that??? What don't you like - Gynnar posted useful material, posted useful links?... I don't know, in your opinion, in order to determine what kind of player someone is, do you need to fill the entire "Stronghold tactics" topic with off-topic chatter? What does lowering morale have to do with it? What does "you're saying it's universal, but I'm saying it's not universal, through Pavel Morozov and Rosa Luxemburg" have to do with it?...
Just - describe your tactic, and the reader will decide for himself what is most useful to him from what is offered here.
Just - if you are so concerned about it, play a game and find out who is better, and then drop the subject.
I have nothing against you or your level of play; I am mainly concerned about the prospect of completely ruining the topic...