Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Suggestion for a friendly resource. Worth discussing!
I read the first two posts and was about to write my own comment when I started reading the following ones and didn't understand their meaning at all ;) (no offense). I still don’t understand what someone’s subjective rating has to do with it? Oh well:) I know the heroes.by website; in fact, I have almost finished reading it. Honestly, I learned a lot and significantly improved my gameplay by reading reports from such strong players. It is very nice that you made this offer.
In general, they also said that we don't have a clearly defined system for online games. I agree; everything is in its early stages. We may develop our own system over time. However, I think that other people's experience and cooperation have never hindered anyone.
+1000!!! Respect. We are currently only starting to form ranked online games, and we would be very grateful if you could help us refine them. We will listen to your advice, which you provide in this topic /topic/3516/
Please express your opinion on what framework you see as possible for a match.
Yes, and will it be the same thing as you did with the champions of England?))) Maybe you can start by participating in a game for our ranking? Personally, I’d rather lose nine out of ten games against a strong opponent and win one (if I get lucky:)), but gain invaluable experience. I think that would be better at first; otherwise, we will just argue here, which might not lead to anything. You can read about our rating in the first five topics at this link /forum/section/62/