Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
In general, there are no inherently good or bad castles; it all comes down to the player's skill. However, it's worth noting that human, elven, and necromancer castles have certain advantages in specific situations. I reiterate, these are not absolute advantages, but rather partial ones. There are instances where a necropolis, for example, might be ineffective on a small map. Furthermore, the matchup between factions is crucial. A tower, for instance, often outperforms a swamp, while a barbarian can dismantle a tower under certain circumstances, but is roughly equal in a match against a swamp. Therefore, humans, elves, and necromancers possess a slight overall advantage due to a combination of factors. It's important to highlight that humans and elves consistently perform well, unlike necromancers, whose performance can vary. For the remaining factions, their effectiveness depends on the specific situation.