kcfgogbfalgfl
Auto-translated
—These are... very curious theoretical and philosophical trials. I wouldn't be surprised if the final "scores" depend on the "number" chosen now... —he smirked at this unfunny joke, then turned his gaze to his companion. —...It is usually believed that people from large families don't seek something similar in their future lives, and vice versa, but I think this only applies to those whose childhood had more hardships than happiness. For me, there is nothing better than a large and close-knit family, so my answer is obvious, but... your opinion here plays a big role.
Added 19 minutes later
- Oh, my dear, even if you were a land whale, you would still be the most beautiful and most beloved, and we should have enough resources for any kind of family.
Upon closer inspection, it becomes clear that the signs pointed in completely different directions, and the deceptive picture was created due to the two-dimensional nature of the image.
Added 3 minutes later
-- Mmmmmmm, -- Furia frowned. -- Can you explain the meaning of this trial to me, Am? This is not something we can influence. What's the point of wanting one thing if the universe decides otherwise?
-- From the point of view of some kind of optimality, I'm actually afraid that I would be a very bad mother. How often would I be at home? How long would I live? Wouldn't my family face too many risks because of me? But, from the point of view of leaving some kind of legacy on Anush, mathematically, we should have at least three? Then (almost) certainly someone will carry the family name in future generations, right? That's how I reason...
-- Well, two is a realistic middle ground, or what do you think? But I repeat, I don't have any power here; it doesn't work that way.