kcfgogbfalgfl
Auto-translated
Suyen joins Erefir and Matthias in the Forum Game.
Kumarian Military Campaign
The further a person is from the front lines, the more they support the war, because a civilized person often finds meaning in other pursuits, and only those who crave glory or wealth remain interested – things that are of little use in the afterlife. However, it cannot be denied that certain circumstances, in particular geographical, demographic, and economic ones, can tip the scales of diplomacy in favor of military confrontation. This also applies to defensive wars – they only make sense when the actions of a potential aggressor would lead to worse consequences for both the current and future generations than the sacrifices and destruction caused by the war.
Based on this, I believe that any military campaign should be considered in terms of its pros and cons for the country and its people. In annexing Kridear, Welfern acquired a good location in the middle of the Great Sea for building a port, which serves as a transit point for southern trade routes; in addition, there is currently an undefined potential for developing new resources in this land. However, these two points are the only positive aspects of this military campaign, and otherwise we have acquired remote islands, far from the mainland empire, the maintenance of which costs us more than what we get back from this region; the population of these lands is culturally and even biologically incompatible with us, and moreover, they are hostile to us and, in a moment of weakness, could pose a threat to the stability of other regions; also, due to the unique climate and biocenosis, there is a non-zero risk of bringing to the mainland diseases and other adverse conditions previously unknown to the human body.
The Right to Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Thought
In the long run, fighting against opinions and ideas will inevitably lead to stagnation in all areas of human activity, and a country burdened with such a burden will not be able to compete with more flexible competitors and will find it more difficult to adapt to crises of various kinds. However, it should be understood that any new idea or attempt to change the rules of the game that have been established in the past should not be imposed "from above," but should compete with the established rules of the game in a public format, and for this to be possible, all members of society must be well-educated and possess developed critical thinking.
The Inviolability of Private Property
A person can only be free if their rights, in particular the right to privacy and the integrity of property, are respected by other members of society, or if there is no social contract between them at all, and in this case, everyone is on their own. Any other form is a sign of an unjust society or tyranny.
The Right to Self-Defense and to Bear Arms
Similar to the point above. Weapons are necessary for self-defense, and the right to self-defense is necessary to protect one's life and the lives of one's loved ones. The absence of such a rule makes law-abiding citizens defenseless against criminals.
Prohibition of Prostitution
In a healthy society, there is no need for such services, so in my opinion, this decision eliminates the symptom, not the problem.
Prohibition of Abortions
In the case of violence or health problems, this issue can be discussed at length, but in all other cases, the answer to it is self-evident: when engaging in intimate relationships, people make a conscious choice and the risks associated with it, one of which is becoming a parent. An adult must be responsible for their actions, and murder committed in an attempt to escape them cannot be justified.
Restrictions on Openness of Wardrobe (not implemented)
It depends, of course, on fashion, but in general, I like to see beautiful clothes on beautiful women, so for me personally, this could be a drawback, but I will not venture to judge the more far-reaching consequences
Kumarian Military Campaign
The further a person is from the front lines, the more they support the war, because a civilized person often finds meaning in other pursuits, and only those who crave glory or wealth remain interested – things that are of little use in the afterlife. However, it cannot be denied that certain circumstances, in particular geographical, demographic, and economic ones, can tip the scales of diplomacy in favor of military confrontation. This also applies to defensive wars – they only make sense when the actions of a potential aggressor would lead to worse consequences for both the current and future generations than the sacrifices and destruction caused by the war.
Based on this, I believe that any military campaign should be considered in terms of its pros and cons for the country and its people. In annexing Kridear, Welfern acquired a good location in the middle of the Great Sea for building a port, which serves as a transit point for southern trade routes; in addition, there is currently an undefined potential for developing new resources in this land. However, these two points are the only positive aspects of this military campaign, and otherwise we have acquired remote islands, far from the mainland empire, the maintenance of which costs us more than what we get back from this region; the population of these lands is culturally and even biologically incompatible with us, and moreover, they are hostile to us and, in a moment of weakness, could pose a threat to the stability of other regions; also, due to the unique climate and biocenosis, there is a non-zero risk of bringing to the mainland diseases and other adverse conditions previously unknown to the human body.
The Right to Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Thought
In the long run, fighting against opinions and ideas will inevitably lead to stagnation in all areas of human activity, and a country burdened with such a burden will not be able to compete with more flexible competitors and will find it more difficult to adapt to crises of various kinds. However, it should be understood that any new idea or attempt to change the rules of the game that have been established in the past should not be imposed "from above," but should compete with the established rules of the game in a public format, and for this to be possible, all members of society must be well-educated and possess developed critical thinking.
The Inviolability of Private Property
A person can only be free if their rights, in particular the right to privacy and the integrity of property, are respected by other members of society, or if there is no social contract between them at all, and in this case, everyone is on their own. Any other form is a sign of an unjust society or tyranny.
The Right to Self-Defense and to Bear Arms
Similar to the point above. Weapons are necessary for self-defense, and the right to self-defense is necessary to protect one's life and the lives of one's loved ones. The absence of such a rule makes law-abiding citizens defenseless against criminals.
Prohibition of Prostitution
In a healthy society, there is no need for such services, so in my opinion, this decision eliminates the symptom, not the problem.
Prohibition of Abortions
In the case of violence or health problems, this issue can be discussed at length, but in all other cases, the answer to it is self-evident: when engaging in intimate relationships, people make a conscious choice and the risks associated with it, one of which is becoming a parent. An adult must be responsible for their actions, and murder committed in an attempt to escape them cannot be justified.
Restrictions on Openness of Wardrobe (not implemented)
It depends, of course, on fashion, but in general, I like to see beautiful clothes on beautiful women, so for me personally, this could be a drawback, but I will not venture to judge the more far-reaching consequences