Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Importance? For me, the most important thing about a tier 3 building is whether it needs to be built to construct higher-tier units. Because if I see an Ifrit lair and a Fire magic book, I'll do everything to get Ifrits by the first week and raid their lair, with the idea of then transitioning to Armageddons. And no matter how excellent Cerberuses are, I'll play without them because they don't need to be built for Ifrits... That's what importance means. Or, if I see an external stable and have a real chance to build it in the first week, it's not a given that I'll build Griffins, even though they are good. I don't even need to talk about Necropolis – I don't remember ever building Spectres in the first week; they're not needed for either Vampires or Black Knights. How do you measure importance? It's different for everyone. I always prioritize army speed, so I try not to build units that slow it down. And also, here people are comparing upgraded units. But that's not entirely correct. Because it's not always possible to upgrade, and there are other priorities.
See, you have your own development strategy, and I have mine; our opinions differ, and that's perfectly fine because it's not a given that one or another statement here will be more correct. For example, I see development completely differently and consider building each unit appropriate for other reasons