Auto-translated
Generally, arguing about "who is better at the third level" is as pointless as arguing about "who would win - a bruiser or Schwarzenegger"...
You can argue endlessly about who is better - a nomad or a wraith, an archangel or a hydra. It all depends on the circumstances; almost every monster has its own unique properties, which makes them incomparable.
One thing is good - it seems we have already discussed all the creatures at each level in this section. I hope we don't get to the point where we start polling "who from the fourth level can defeat more creatures from the third level":)))))
In some cases, I would trade a stack of archangels for a nomad.... In some, seven stacks of archangels for one hydra..... In some, one hydra for a hundred archangels - that's just a fantastic offer:))))))
IMHO, it's a pointless question.
You can argue endlessly about who is better - a nomad or a wraith, an archangel or a hydra. It all depends on the circumstances; almost every monster has its own unique properties, which makes them incomparable.
One thing is good - it seems we have already discussed all the creatures at each level in this section. I hope we don't get to the point where we start polling "who from the fourth level can defeat more creatures from the third level":)))))
In some cases, I would trade a stack of archangels for a nomad.... In some, seven stacks of archangels for one hydra..... In some, one hydra for a hundred archangels - that's just a fantastic offer:))))))
IMHO, it's a pointless question.