Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
-- You can lose your life anywhere and for any reason, what’s so sad about that? It’s more important how you live and what you leave behind, not how you end your life. However, she did leave something truly significant, there is no doubt about that.
- Well, you yourself have answered your question. Is it sadder to die without leaving anything behind, or to live a meaningful life with a sense of duty fulfilled and leave behind a great legacy for centuries to come? And yet, the first option is much more common. Author
-- No, personal experience says otherwise. Moreover, our country is not a wasteland; any traveler who has talents to offer will not starve.
- As long as there are good times and stability, yes, but we can only thank the last two emperors and all those who worked for such a present. Author
-- That is true, but in the context of personal happiness, only his self-perception matters, not the common good. The common good comes into the equation when we are looking for the ideal optimum for everyone between freedom and restrictions.
- Perhaps a person believes that, like the natives of Helma, he has wings, and according to his self-perception, he needs to jump off a cliff to be happy, but it would be better for both him and society if this path is closed to him and he is directed down a different path instead.