What can I say? Let's put it this way: it's not worse than the second and third films in the series. Which, in itself, is an achievement, because I expected complete garbage. So, if you like the second and third films to some extent, what makes this one so much worse? And if you're a normal person and understand that only the first one was good, does it really matter what they filmed in the fourth one? That's why I postponed watching the film and now I'm writing all this as a latecomer. And, frankly, my opinion hasn't changed; I just occasionally come across discussions about this film, so I had to watch it to avoid feeling confused and irritated by discussions about something I don't know about. It's clear that in some places they tried to play everything ironically, but these attempts still feel weak and desperate, like an actor who comes on stage, realizes that he can't pull off the act, and tries to make understanding jokes about it in places. On the other hand, as I said, the second and third parts weren't much better, but they were presented with the utmost seriousness and with a filter that had become tiresome by that time. So, it's good enough to watch with a beer. And if anyone is interested in the plot but doesn't want to spend time watching it or even reading Wikipedia, the machines resurrected Neo and Trinity and put them back into the Matrix. Some of the machines switched sides and joined the humans. 60 years have passed. Neo and Trinity woke up after a long imprisonment and now they can fly and do all sorts of crazy things in the Matrix. And that's what they'll do. In my opinion, this plot is an answer to many viewers who thought that the ending of the original trilogy was too dark, as if the machines weren't allowed to win, and Neo and Trinity died. Well, now you get it.
Where do we end up when we save the world?