Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Nah, there isn't a single dwarf companion in Baldur's Gate 3. Why? Because not many people would romance them (as if that's a requirement).
Considering how many people were obsessed with the goblin NPCs, there would have been an audience. I'm not so sure about the others, though.
In principle, there is a gnome who is a semi-companion (an NPC who hangs out in the camp and has his own questline). In my opinion, he's one of the best NPCs in the game, and he's written in a "simpler" way, closer to the companions from earlier games, rather than being just another chosen one with a bunch of extra bells and whistles. I would personally be glad to see him as a full-fledged companion, especially since he has his own personal arc and character development. But I agree that Larian made the cast very one-sided if you look at the existing companions: three humans (Will, Gale, and Minsk), three elves (Astarion, Halsin, and Minthara), two half-elves (Shadowheart and Jaheira), and one human with a touch of otherworldly blood (Karlach). The only exception is Lae'zel, if you ignore the fact that even githyanki, according to the lore, originated from humans. Ironically, she is also one of the most down-to-earth companions, without any of the extra bells and whistles like a super-artifact in her chest. I agree with the likely reason for this approach.