Actually, how many judges are planned?

In my opinion, at least two judges are needed, and if this idea is actually implemented and becomes successful, then three would be good (although I thought that maybe that would be too many, because, hopefully, there won't be too many controversial moments; rather, I hope there won't be any at all :). But since players will be playing every day and situations may arise at any time, and judges are also people, two is just right! :smile20:
When we discuss the rules, we need to create four topics:
1. Meeting place (where players will find opponents)
2. Reports of games from the winners with mandatory confirmation from the losers
3. Online Player Rating, where the table itself will be, the principle of calculating rating points, and the rules of the battles will be published, which, by the way, we haven't yet compiled/discussed.
4. A topic where various controversial issues and their solutions will be discussed.
And then, forward to the battlefield :smile13: :)