Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
The latest expansion pack has been released. Now, certain things are clear.
I was just drawing a comparison to the discussion about graphics. Honestly, I don't see a trend towards making things more cartoonish. Can you really say that "Shrek" is more cartoonish than "Hedgehog in the Fog"? And your position painfully reminds me of an old man saying, "Back in my day, there were really interesting cartoons! But now..." (maybe the domino analogy was less successful).
First, it's incorrect to compare different animated films: "Shrek" is in no way a continuation of "Hedgehog in the Fog," so there's no trend here, I'm sorry (in relation to our conversation). You can compare "Shrek" to "Shrek 2," but that comparison won't help us here, unfortunately. Second, no matter how much I remind you of an old man in my reasoning, we're not talking about interesting/not interesting, understand? I'm not saying that HoMM V is worse/better, more/less interesting, so the example is again incorrect, I apologize. We're talking exclusively about graphics, and we're specifically discussing cartoonishness, not beauty or interest, for example. I also mentioned uniqueness earlier, but that doesn't fit your statement either. You don't see a trend, but I do, what can I do?! I see that by maintaining a positive trend in this direction, we will ultimately get more cartoonishness (maintaining is the key word here), and that's what was said at the beginning of our discussion. Reread Olga's message again so that we don't stray into another topic (I'm trying to discuss it within its framework).