Guys, what are you arguing about? Heroes 5 is a simple game, nothing special. Here, they say that Heroes 3 was special because of its atmosphere and graphics, but that's not the point. At the time, Heroes 3 didn't have any worthy competitors in the same style, so it seemed cool. But now, when so many games have appeared, Heroes 5 doesn't look as super as Heroes 3 did. As for Heroes 4, I respect this series; it's a really good game with magic, heroes fighting, and outstanding characters. If they had brought it to completion, it would have been a great game. In general, in my opinion, Heroes 5 is nothing special. Boring races, weak magic, boring orcs, overpowered dwarves. I would order the guys at Ubisoft to release Heroes 5 with at least 12 races (for example, add invaders from another dimension/planet; that would be original) (because what are these races? They're boring, and there's nothing new). Increase the game speed and AI, strengthen the magic, create mage and warrior classes for each race, and make the siege more complex (ideally, those who are besieging should be 2-3 times more numerous than those defending). Added after 15 minutes

I just get bored playing "Heroes 5" after a few hours. I only play GSC maps, but they turn out to be monotonous. The artifacts are the same (clover, ring of the broken spirit, lion's collar, ...), and they removed the ability to find the Tear of Ascha. In general, in "Heroes 3," there was always hope for victory (even when you were very far behind in development): you found some super artifact (and you wouldn't even mind losing the whole army for it), and you're the king, but in "Heroes 5," there are no such artifacts that I would be willing to lose my army for. In general, I personally get tired of playing pretty quickly.

Yeah, I agree with that! The artifacts are bad