Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
- And that's it? It seems a bit too simple, - Aiyano replies skeptically. - The catch, I suppose, is that someone might try to sabotage or backstab you on such an assignment. No offense, - she adds, raising her palm preemptively so the man doesn't take it personally. - I'm just imagining how it might look from the perspective of a shopkeeper, when a mysterious customer shows up and starts meticulously scrutinizing everything. At best, they'll just wave you away - "you're off the list for today," and at worst, they'll cause you trouble. And what about the employees whose rights are supposed to be protected in this way? I won't pretend to be an expert on your laws, and I don't want this conversation to turn into an ideological and philosophical discussion, but somehow I feel that the employer has many ways to negatively influence a complaining employee as a punishment, which cannot be fully prevented by labor law. Thus, there is a chance that the employee's situation will even worsen, and in some cases, I can imagine them completely losing their job as a result of a combination of undesirable factors - and this wouldn't fall under any specific violations. Can you tell me where my reasoning might be flawed? She was about to ask the union representative if he risks eating at local restaurants after such maneuvers, but she decided against raising that question.