Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
No, General ZeT, I don't think so. My initial opinion about him being a bad tactician hasn't changed. This doesn't mean I don't respect your opinion. But I can't accept it, not even fully understand it.
After all, all these examples are taken out of context, from the game. I just can't imagine a battle between a Djinn and a Black Dragon, a Leprechaun and a Colossus. It's unlikely that such a battle is even possible. I consider the entire game as a whole, the entire strategy. And if you (or I) happen to have useless units in a particular battle, then you (or I) are to blame. In any case, it is always known who you will be fighting, whether it's neutral creatures guarding something or an opponent.