Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I don't believe that he was specifically targeted by the killer.
Why? What else is he supposed to do? Randomly block, hoping to save himself from being killed by the Mafia or block the defender/doctor of his victim? That would be good, of course, but, as I said before, it's still a gamble. But using Night Vision on the same player who stole it from him is a great move. The town is likely to notice this (and it did), while the killer kills someone else. Everyone will focus on the evidence, as it's more beneficial to execute the Mafia based on a block than to guess based on evidence. Instead of killing, he could have gone to investigate again to gather more Night Vision. Personally, I think the second option is more likely; I don't think the killer would immediately go for a kill. If I were the killer, I would play it that way.
Author
I don't like Nebka's logical chain of reasoning regarding the killer's actions. The logic of executing Medj only makes sense if Nebka is the killer and is responsible for the drug addiction he describes.
It's a normal move; the killer did well, I give him credit, but I'll still hang him later