Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Moni mentioned Ara Nebо mentioned Moni Master mentioned me I mentioned Neyra reaction level 0%
Ment stirred up Yashur Neyra stirred up Ment activity level in the topic 20%
Kosha, Arandor, Nebo, Moni, Ment are actively chatting in the topic chat level 50%
What does 0 reaction mean? Everything was discussed normally... I voiced my position regarding the events in the newspaper; there aren't many, so there aren't many possible interpretations. Only the evidence remains to be discussed, but it's difficult and time-consuming to find, and I've exhausted my limit. Author
I analyzed the interpretation and came to the conclusion that it lacks a solid foundation. Through exactly the same link, I can go from Chaki to William Wallace => was killed by hanging-gutting-quartered, or from Cao Cao to Lü Bu, who was "strangled."
Hmm, okay, I accept that. Author
Regarding the thesis mentioned a couple of times, "Rani got involved due to unrequited love" - doesn't it seem to you that you are mixing up both a hint about the killer and the role of the victim? It doesn't work that way. Even if we assume that this is a simultaneous hint about two things, then in this way we must completely exclude "strangled by a noose," or "intellectuals messed up." It turns out that either a deliberately false piece of lore was added to complicate the task, which is not impossible, but goes against the usual format of presenting murders, or the piece was added for a reason, and it is wrong to ignore it.
I checked the descriptions in the previous Revan mafia game. And I came to the conclusion that anything is possible. Author
I also think that it makes sense to return to a greater "visibility" of non-direct clues in the newspapers, but this, of course, assumes that we will continue to gather.
It's worth considering. It seems that it was introduced due to the small number of players, when all the mafia members were identified already on the second day, simply based on the non-direct clues in the newspaper.