I understand that you are moderating this topic for some reason, as you do with many other topics. I can say that the ratio of your number of posts (and their content) compared to mine suggests the opposite. Moreover, the voting results clearly do not favor you.
P.S. What specifically convincing arguments did you provide to prove that Heroes 5 is so much better that it makes playing Heroes 3 uninteresting?
If you are trying to emphasize the quality of the graphics or simply your opinion against my opinion or the opinion of any forum user, then it sounds unconvincing. Moreover, even if Heroes 3 were worse, that is not a reason to forget about it. I hope you also understand the essence of the question, which is that "we are not choosing the best part"!
The question is: "Will you play Heroes 3 after the release of Heroes 5?". However, the answer (!) implies that Heroes 3 is the best, and it is stated directly. Arguments about which games are better and which are worse are pointless. Naturally, Heroes 5 is not Heroes 3 (just as Quake 1 is not Quake 3). The main thing is that the essence of the game is preserved (or maybe it can be called something else? The spirit?). When you have two different games in front of you, it is difficult to compare them. And one more point: the voting results speak for themselves.
