Auto-translated
Regarding the formula!
After all, Kolbasser came up with the formula, right? So why should skills be more important than the number of cities according to his formula? The "Race for the Leader" tournament rating, as I see it, is not related to our classic rating!
A small example: there are 50 mercury guarded by hydras. And at the other end, there is an artifact that gives +4 to attack.
Following the first path, we gain 3 levels (for example), which means +3 to skills and +50 mercury.
Following the second path, we get +4 to skills.
According to the classic formula, we will get a higher rating by using the second path, but according to Kolbasser's formula... you do the math! :)
After all, Kolbasser came up with the formula, right? So why should skills be more important than the number of cities according to his formula? The "Race for the Leader" tournament rating, as I see it, is not related to our classic rating!
A small example: there are 50 mercury guarded by hydras. And at the other end, there is an artifact that gives +4 to attack.
Following the first path, we gain 3 levels (for example), which means +3 to skills and +50 mercury.
Following the second path, we get +4 to skills.
According to the classic formula, we will get a higher rating by using the second path, but according to Kolbasser's formula... you do the math! :)
