On-line rating (discussion)

Thanks, guys, for your feedback.

No problem... We'll share our thoughts, and it's too early to call this idea, which was put up for discussion with the aim of improvement, just "fluff"...

The task is complex, I agree, but I think I'll automate it later (I'll figure out how), the main thing is to start.

Regarding the comparison of rating calculations, check out the topic: "rating of ONLINE tournaments". If necessary, I can send you something to your inbox - you can take a look and see if you like it or not...

As for you, LI, you are also right in some ways, but still
not all good players have awards (for various reasons).

(if you've started writing, then write "Lei") Undoubtedly. But it is also undeniable that those who have them have good knowledge and an approach to the game itself. ;)

[U]I'M THROWINGA LINEthink about it

Rating depends on (points):
1 Number of games (obvious)
2 Who you play against (strong, weak, the same)
3 For activity (a lot is good, and points are also awarded for losses)
4 Agreement or refusal in battles
5 ...... (we are thinking)

Why not combine a couple of points? :) But personally, I'm against rating for activity; everyone gets busy sometimes...