Skip to content

On-line rating (discussion)

User Avatar
#8
Auto-translated
Thanks, guys, for your feedback.
INVISIBLE, I see that you see everything and understood me.
I won't refuse help with links; if you can, write them here for this purpose, as it makes it easier for me to discuss.
The task is complex, I agree, but I think I'll automate it later (I'll figure out how), the main thing is to start.

As for you, LI, you are also right in some ways, but still:
not all good players have awards (for various reasons).
You haven't played with everyone, so it's not easy to say with whom it will be more interesting to play. Yes, you've played with some once or twice, and you know them, but others... and so on.

I think there are definitely advantages to having a ranking system.
But the disadvantages need to be worked on.

Added after 18 minutes
I'm CASTING a LINE, let's think.

The ranking depends on (points):
1. The number of games (obvious).
2. The opponent you play against (strong, weak, the same).
3. Activity (more is good, and points are also awarded for losses).
4. Agreement or refusal in battles.
5. ... (we're thinking).

TRUTH IS BORN IN DISPUTE...)))))
SS-D:smile17: