raspisnoy
Auto-translated
I started the game and immediately had a question. Is it normal that the main character isn't displayed? 
Added 3 hours 28 minutes later
I didn't like the map. I got to Krigan in the first part and realized that the logic and mechanics of Heroes had disappeared. I defeated Krigan, but I didn't want to continue playing. Heroes is built on tactics and mechanics that the player can calculate against the AI. Here, they add invented abilities like cloning troops, and not even your own, without any logical calculation. Are we really playing Heroes? All these made-up gimmicks, designed to complicate the game, have nothing to do with the game itself. You could give the opponent twice as many troops, or give them three schools and a ton of mana. And that would be a challenge for someone who knows the game's mechanics – but that would be a different game.
Everything else is fine; the battles on G. are challenging, especially considering that it's desirable to play without losses, as the fort on the hill has also been nerfed by the author.
Added 3 hours 28 minutes later
I didn't like the map. I got to Krigan in the first part and realized that the logic and mechanics of Heroes had disappeared. I defeated Krigan, but I didn't want to continue playing. Heroes is built on tactics and mechanics that the player can calculate against the AI. Here, they add invented abilities like cloning troops, and not even your own, without any logical calculation. Are we really playing Heroes? All these made-up gimmicks, designed to complicate the game, have nothing to do with the game itself. You could give the opponent twice as many troops, or give them three schools and a ton of mana. And that would be a challenge for someone who knows the game's mechanics – but that would be a different game.
Everything else is fine; the battles on G. are challenging, especially considering that it's desirable to play without losses, as the fort on the hill has also been nerfed by the author.
Всегда играю на Г.