Менестрель
Auto-translated
Boy... quite a bit of demagoguery going on here...
Who told you that Heroes 5 should be like other Heroes games? I love the 2nd one most of all, but I'm not screaming that the griffins aren't with the Warlock!
This is a completely different game, a different style, and it should be viewed as a project in need of support, not as "Heroes 3: Part Five"...
Xaker is right. Don't like it much? Then don't play. What's the point of saying "Stupid game!"? Explain your point of view: what, how, and why. Not everyone is as smart as you! Especially since there's no reason to criticize Nival and Ubi. There must have been some reasons why they specifically were the ones making the game. They were given an idea and a blueprint, and they brought it to life. In my opinion, quite well.
On subject: It's made competently, and it's interesting to play. Few downsides (such as: everything is very slow, models aren't fully detailed, etc.)
Who told you that Heroes 5 should be like other Heroes games? I love the 2nd one most of all, but I'm not screaming that the griffins aren't with the Warlock!
This is a completely different game, a different style, and it should be viewed as a project in need of support, not as "Heroes 3: Part Five"...
Xaker is right. Don't like it much? Then don't play. What's the point of saying "Stupid game!"? Explain your point of view: what, how, and why. Not everyone is as smart as you! Especially since there's no reason to criticize Nival and Ubi. There must have been some reasons why they specifically were the ones making the game. They were given an idea and a blueprint, and they brought it to life. In my opinion, quite well.
On subject: It's made competently, and it's interesting to play. Few downsides (such as: everything is very slow, models aren't fully detailed, etc.)