This doesn't concern the current game, but I still want to say something. The behavior of your last two characters in my games looked like a deliberate attempt to find trouble and die, so that later you could accuse me of the same things that I regularly accuse you of. Like, you're saying to me: "Look, you also kill me with random weaklings, just like I kill you, so what's the problem?".
Added 12 minutes ago
But since you brought it up, I took the time to find this moment:
I didn't feel any benefit from the successful intimidation.
- As you wish.
Hanzo releases the elf from his friendly embrace, throws him at the pikeman, and attacks the swordswoman with a katana.
He should have at least led him into an alley, not pressed him in the middle of the street...
Well, firstly, I wasn't beating him in broad daylight, we were just talking (they have a lot of free time or a lot of staff if they interrogate everyone passing by in the city). And secondly, the guards are guards, but I was the one intimidating him, and he immediately backed down, so there's no ultimate difference between successful intimidation and failed intimidation... He would have surrendered either way.
I realized that you are diligently looking for flaws in the mechanics in order to pick on me. I don't know why, but I won't continue the conversation and explain anything.
I don't think I wrote anything that could be classified as picking on you. I just voiced a thought about one specific event at the moment it was relevant. But whatever.