Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Dirty_Player, don't be so greedy! You need to be, not just appear to be! As for a specific individual, of course, you can demand that filming be prohibited if you don't want to be filmed specifically. I'm talking about the general crowd, trash content, drunken parties, etc. If a blogger, either intentionally to boost hype/views or accidentally, films such trash content, who will chase after them and monitor it? Who will review what they filmed, what can be posted, and what seems to cross some boundaries? Will the organizers, who already have enough unresolved problems, as we can see, take care of this?
Well, "being greedy" is just an example. Would you be happy if you were filmed, for example, while you were going to the toilet? Probably not. So, every person has moments that they wouldn't want to be broadcast. Some have more, some have less. The person filming should use their own head and think about what they are filming, instead of pointing the camera at everything that moves. There's no need to monitor anything; if you don't like it, report the channel, and that's it. Dust_HL
If this bothers you so much personally, behave in a civilized manner within the boundaries that you wouldn't want someone to see, and there will be no problems. Please explain how you would implement a stop-list mechanism. Do you think you can forbid Matrosov from coming to the CIS and he will obediently agree? What about Vigo or Beshe? They wouldn't care at all. They might even come specifically out of spite, just to provoke. How are you going to physically restrict the presence of one person or another? It would be very interesting to see this in action.
First of all, there might not be room at the venue. And if such a person does come, finds a place to stay, and continues to interfere, then personally, I am ready to refuse to judge and run the tournament. And in the future, I will also refuse to travel to such championships. I go to these tournaments to relax with friends, not to deal with drunkards. Dust_HL
Of course, I don't support their behavior, but on the other hand, it's even funny.
Of course, it's funny. It's funny when you drink with them and watch them bother others. But when they interfere with you doing your job, it's not so funny. Why does it come to this? Because society supports it, saying, "go ahead, have fun." Someone might even take them in out of kindness, and then they end up with overturned tables. Dust_HL
And if a jerk is bothering you specifically, there are much simpler ways to explain to the annoying person that they should tone it down. IMHO.
Dirty_Player
You need to be, not just appear to be!
As for a specific individual, of course, you can demand that filming be prohibited if you don't want to be filmed specifically. I'm talking about the general crowd, trash content, drunken parties, etc. If a blogger, either intentionally to boost hype/views or accidentally, films such trash content, who will chase after them and monitor it? Who will review what they filmed, what can be posted, and what seems to cross some boundaries? Will the organizers, who already have enough unresolved problems, as we can see, take care of this?