⚔️Serberia

The question is about the ambiguity - nitpicking details.

No, this isn't nitpicking details; it's precisely the element that significantly influenced our decision. Of course, we can't be sure – perhaps without the cat, we would have acted exactly the same way. But when the cat first gives a sign that leads to catastrophic consequences, and when I ask, "Why didn't he try to do anything to stop us?" the answer is, "Well, it's your problem that you didn't understand something" – that's essentially telling us to go away.

Added 1 minute ago
I decided to attack immediately because of the cat's hint. On Ple-Sena – a person who definitely doesn't suffer from the "boot syndrome" – this clearly had an influence, judging by his post. Therefore, calling this nitpicking details means distorting the facts.