eXeCuToR
Auto-translated
I would choose leadership because leadership is more important for the Barbarians.
Added 4 minutes later
And in general, two attacks are better than one successful attack. For example, against you, there are 2 enemies, and both groups have very little health left, but you have even less (let's assume that you also take them out with one hit, and they take you out with one hit), and then you approach and kill one, which gives you good morale, and you can also easily finish off the other. But if you have bad luck, then they will most likely finish you off.
You actually used my argument!))) We are like-minded!))) My respect to you.
The situation can be exactly the opposite. You might need to take out a unit with one hit, for example, so that the hero doesn't have time to cast a spell. Then, undoubtedly, luck is better.
And it's even better when you have both!))) This discussion has become a bit strange - it all depends on the situation and the player's preferences. It would be more correct to ask: what do you prefer, luck or morale?
Step aside from the way of a better man than you
So you fall at his feet hes the one who betrays you
Its the servants devotion for the decay
Stand up
There are no flowers on your grave
There are no chains
There I keep chanting for the forgotten name © Amorphis
So you fall at his feet hes the one who betrays you
Its the servants devotion for the decay
Stand up
There are no flowers on your grave
There are no chains
There I keep chanting for the forgotten name © Amorphis