Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
There is a point here that the throne had already been passed first to Koymaji, and then to Mariarnelia. Additionally, there is this passage:
The system of succession established by Eidos the Iron favored those relatives of the ruler who were in their prime - thus, the elderly were excluded, and the very young were avoided until there were no alternatives.
That is, Maria-Tenerezza and Carnea have more right to the throne under such practices than Renavan does. And that assumes he can somehow prove the truth of his identity. In a setting where even good mages have disguise spells, this could be quite difficult. Especially in the context that the current Renavan is a mage, while the previous one was not known for such talents.
Does such a system still apply after the aristocratic coup? I thought at some point the lords were appointing their puppets. And did Renavan himself officially designate Koymik as his heir before the pseudo-drowning?
Heroist
