Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
But against Kandle, the RNG was on your side. That bastard only missed twice in 10 rounds, one of which was against you.
Yeah, overall 2 wins on luck, 3 losses on bad luck, it'll do.
What's much worse is the 5% guaranteed hit chance introduced by "someone," because I was planning to stack evasion further in the future, and now I can't even get a rough sense of how it would develop.
I generally think it would be more logical to make the accuracy and evasion system a double roll. First an accuracy roll. If it passes, then an evasion roll. Otherwise, even the most clumsy hit lands on a paralyzed target...
But paralysis simply removes the target's dodge, meaning you can miss a paralyzed character. And you're suggesting a very clunky mechanic. It'd be simpler to just set a fixed threshold for defense/dodge that the attacking character has to beat.
Ple-Sen
