Аделаида
Auto-translated
Hey guys, don't argue...
I haven't changed the rules, and Alex won according to the rules in the spring... the rules state that in case of disputed moments, there wasn't a disputed moment here; Alex won the final game against Uran, and they had the same RO (Round Objective), but Alex won against Uran in the final... by the way, I use the same principle when ranking players in the table: if the RO is the same, but one player won against the other in their head-to-head matches, then an extra game isn't needed. However, this doesn't apply to technical wins and losses; if Alex had won against Uran technically and tied the RO, then an extra game would have been needed because there wouldn't have been a result from the head-to-head match based on the game played.
I hope I explained it clearly. Everything will be the same as in the spring, and the rules regarding this haven't changed at all.
I haven't changed the rules, and Alex won according to the rules in the spring... the rules state that in case of disputed moments, there wasn't a disputed moment here; Alex won the final game against Uran, and they had the same RO (Round Objective), but Alex won against Uran in the final... by the way, I use the same principle when ranking players in the table: if the RO is the same, but one player won against the other in their head-to-head matches, then an extra game isn't needed. However, this doesn't apply to technical wins and losses; if Alex had won against Uran technically and tied the RO, then an extra game would have been needed because there wouldn't have been a result from the head-to-head match based on the game played.
I hope I explained it clearly. Everything will be the same as in the spring, and the rules regarding this haven't changed at all.