Dirty_Player
Auto-translated
Reddi, man, why are you being such a buzzkill? It was never written anywhere that seeding should be based on rating (?) and specifically the HeroesWorld one (?). I always thought the organizer has the right to decide how to conduct the draw themselves. Honestly, I don't see any problem with it. For the CIS or ChS, no one writes about how the draw is conducted either. It's always decided on the spot every time. So what now, should we just not go to LANs?
The lobby rating is indeed more relevant and indicative right now. Very few games have been played on HeroesWorld over the past year. New players are coming in who have a lobby rating of 600-800 pts, but have 0 on HeroesWorld. So, should I put them in the 4th seed then? Do you think that's fair? You'd better be grateful for such an interesting group. Enot, for example, was happy and said there would be more interesting games.
The lobby rating is indeed more relevant and indicative right now. Very few games have been played on HeroesWorld over the past year. New players are coming in who have a lobby rating of 600-800 pts, but have 0 on HeroesWorld. So, should I put them in the 4th seed then? Do you think that's fair? You'd better be grateful for such an interesting group. Enot, for example, was happy and said there would be more interesting games.