Did you suspect anyone? Did you reason things out? Look for clues? Talk about the game? Did you vote in the end?
You're just as absent as they are. You just come in to chat, to show that you're here.
On the very first day, I even voiced some suspicions, but I don't do it aggressively or confidently without having any solid or complete evidence. In my opinion, such behavior can sometimes only lead to even more confusion. I think the discussion and reasoning are already happening. I didn't understand anything about the clues and the voting. At least I don't suggest a duvet as evidence, and so far, the only executions we've had were NNV and Lock, but I wasn't sure about the second one yesterday.
If you have any questions, ask.
It's just that this "psychology" after a break of several years is... well, it's something. In the previous game, I already said that clues are more important than psychology, even despite the mistakes with the clues.