Mafia 110. Heckelia

The peculiarity of writing a GM story lies in its indirectness. Subsequently, the player accepts this as the truth and doesn't consider other possibilities. Yesterday, I even considered punishing the player, but since he persistently repeated that he believed it, I decided he was just a bad player.

A very strange chain of reasoning, to put it mildly. I don't know what illogical aspects could be found in the Alm version if one simply reads the setting carefully.

So, Sheriff-Sky shot at Fragment, hit Nayra, and then claimed that Nayra was a victim of the marksman's error, and there was no murder by the mafia?

If you read the first day (I know it's difficult, there are many words), you'll see that initially, Sky helped search for clues, which he wouldn't have done if he were the culprit. Later, he changed his mind and suddenly claimed the opposite. Since we're assuming he's Alm, this could only have happened if he wasn't initially sure that Nayra's murder was his doing.

And on the following night, he shot at Fragment again?

Why do you think so? What's with your sudden interest in the ability-less Fragment?

Try to use your head, please.

It seems to me that you're more confused than I am right now, so please keep these remarks to yourself.