Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Give me a definition of "strength" and "independence." You like to slap this label everywhere, but it doesn't really mean anything. Unless by "strength" you mean a high stat. Because a depressing character with anger issues, for example, doesn't seem like a particularly strong person to me.Author
they do what they want, without looking at society and other things
Especially a character for whom the dynasty comes first doesn't look at society.Author
but at the same time, they act as carefully as possible in situations where their life depends on it
Well, you yourself refuted what you wrote above. Good job. I don't even need to respond.Author
they find excuses for any of their actions
Many characters believe their actions are justified. This statement (as well as the point about caution) applies to most expedition characters. Well, except for those who don't even need excuses.Author
they don't repent, and they only regret that they had problems
Firstly, it's a strange claim to make about my characters, when the players' characters almost always do everything together, and if they need to repent, then they all do. Secondly, this statement is far from the truth and shows that you really haven't read the posts, biographies, and epilogues of these characters. I just have one question: why are you even trying to write about them if you're not even familiar with the subject of discussion?