Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Sexual assaults are partly caused by men’s natural impulse.
I love these kinds of questions in these tests. Does the phenomenon of sexual assault exist as such? Yes, it does. Are men the perpetrators in some of these cases? Yes, they are. Are they partially caused by natural impulses? Obviously, they are partially caused by them. Given all this, is it possible to answer anything other than "I absolutely agree" without being dishonest or circumventing the simplest logic, which doesn't require any factual basis and is content with a simple thought experiment? No, it isn't. And if you answer, they'll give you some incomprehensible score, "hurray, women forward." If you answer any option other than zero, it's "cluck-cluck-cluck, men forward," and you'll even say something stupid. You could just as easily ask: "Are you not an idiot?" - "I absolutely agree) well, I agree a little) although, no, I'm more likely to disagree) so, I'm not sure)." And what does all this have to do with my opinion and my view on some issue? Or is this exactly what discourse on any issue has come to in the 21st century - blind, delusional crowing for any nonsense invented out of thin air, regardless of whether it correlates with reality or not, as long as you side with one or another, third, tenth agenda? And am I supposed to guess - aha, it's an English-language test, something political, so it's probably not a test for a low-IQ mathematical idiot, but a test for a low-IQ political idiot, shouting slogans at a rally or on the internet - and hope that I will be understood correctly by the author of the test based on this.
Added 2 hours 13 minutes ago
from the thread, I see that all the real "Work-ers" are here