ToX
Yesterday, Yashchur asked me to analyze the possible responses of Loken-Charlie/Doctor.
Here's what I came up with:
Given: peaceful role, high IQ, no glasses.
Questions:
1) Do you have glasses?
2) Do you have high IQ?
3) Are you a loner?
Truthful answers in this case:
1) No
2) Yes
3) No
I. We lie about the first option, giving the following answers:
1) Yes
2) Yes
3) No
With these answers, the town analyzes the survey as follows:
If the first is a lie: Salzman/Charlie/Abbot
If the second is a lie: potentially a doctor who changed their IQ on the very first night
If the third is a lie: potentially a girl who chose glasses as an item
II. We lie about the second option, giving the following answers:
1) No
2) No
3) No
With these answers, the town analyzes the survey as follows:
If the first is a lie: potentially a doctor who changed their IQ on the very first night
If the second is a lie: Salzman/Charlie/Abbot
If the third is a lie: impossible
III. We lie about the third option, giving the following answers:
1) No
2) Yes
3) Yes
With these answers, the town analyzes the survey as follows:
If the first is a lie: potentially a girl who chose glasses as an item
If the second is a lie: impossible
If the third is a lie: Salzman/Charlie/Abbot
Since it is the third set of answers that eliminates the potentially +1 negative role, i.e., the doctor, I would, if I were Loken Charlie/Salzman, answer exactly like this. And that's what he did, and this is another argument for his peacefulness...
Added 2 minutes ago
Okay, my pointing out the lack of logic – I think that the first association with Natasha Rostova and Bolkonsky is not that one is a social butterfly, and the other is a recluse, but simply that one is a good person, and the other is a noble guy.
What does this mean? I can't say, but you think about it.
