Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Ah, Ment... You forgot that Mana has no negative damage (ND). We only killed him thanks to the board game, which allowed the Reaper to have 2 ND. We did consider the option of using the Berserker's ultimate ability and killing him with the Reaper. But you kept "nerfing" the Reaper. No father, no monster, not even a hypocrite, but specifically the Reaper. That's why I'm asking how you were going to deal with Mana in the future. The answer is simple: you couldn't. "Give the victory to Mana, but not to Mafa"... That's why I started this dialogue. When was the last time a city won with this approach? "Now" doesn't count. We were tired of Mana's constant victories, so we decided to eliminate him, taking advantage of "random chance."
Added 4 minutes later Ment
????
The fact that we won then doesn't change the overall approach to the issue: the city doesn't buff Mana, even when it's directly harmful to him. This is a "disease," in my opinion.
Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно. Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится. (Закон сохранения).