The most USELESS monster.

Ahem... he-he. Did you read my first post in this thread? I think I made it clear that if you can't find a suitable monster for a particular situation, you're just a bad tactician. That's all. Or is there something wrong with my speech...?

I'll try to answer instead of OptiMAL.
So, your speech is fine.
The topic is about the most USELESS monster, where creatures are discussed in a particular situation. And this doesn't mean that these creatures are often found in a player's army, and if they are, the player is a bad tactician. Any creature, even the most useful, can be useless in certain situations and therefore useless in that situation. For example, let's take me and my army: my hero is a Chaos Sorcerer. He knows all the Chaos magic from A to Z. My army consists of 20 Sorceresses, several dozen Orcs, skeletons, Berserkers, etc. On my way to victory, I encounter 17 Black Dragons and Frenzied Bulls. And what should I do? In this situation, the Sorceresses and my Chaos Sorcerer hero are the most useless. The same goes for Magic Dragons and even if I summon Djinns. Now, let's say I have Gargantuas or Dragon Lords instead of the Sorceresses. They will be more useful against the Black Dragons and Frenzied Bulls than the Sorceresses, Djinns, etc.
All of this is to say that the most useful creature can turn out to be the most useless in a certain situation. And it doesn't matter if a good tactician is in charge of the army or a bad one. )))