Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Then, quote what you and Alex wrote during your conversation with Locke. Because what you wrote afterward was no longer part of the discussion.
- We are neutral, we accept anyone we want, we eat cake with tea, and we can take your paladin. - B-but you have a slave owner/demonologist and so on... - Well, if you think you won't fit into our friendly team, create another character.
I see that you still haven't understood anything.
Base your decisions on the beliefs of our characters, and that's it. It seems that I can't explain it any more clearly.
I don't know how much more clearly I need to explain it for you to understand the essence of the discussion. I needed information about the beliefs of your characters. You gave your answer before the discussion with Locken. You are not the only leader. Locken didn't give this answer in the discussion at all. It was given later, when even Alex said that he didn't know anything about one of the leaders, and this information would affect the final image of the organization. And this is the very information that I was trying to get, explaining the uselessness of the saying "we can accept anyone."